SAP & Oracle partner and support companies

Loading

SAP

SAP Customers’ Satisfaction

SAP’s management has been the source of distrust and dissatisfaction. The employees are now expected to answer for the low levels of customer satisfaction. SAP is becoming a grassroots democracy.

It wasn’t just the former deadline 2025 that had many customers dissatisfied with SAP’s management. In the past few years, executives also seemed to completely ignore on prem. Cloud was supposedly the way to go, but many customers had reasonable doubts.

SAP promises it has seen reason. During FKOM (Field Kick-off Meeting) 2020, it proudly proclaimed: We are ERP! There were no over-the-top praises of Hana. The once ambitious cloud program Embrace has effectively been reduced to an exclusive contract with Microsoft. AWS as Embrace partner is practically invisible. Google is still trying – most recently with a booth at the 2020 DSAG Technology Days – but customer interest is low.

SAP’s management failed to recognize the sign of the times. As a result, customer satisfaction is at an all time low, indicated by e.g. its negative Net Promoter Score (meaning that for the first time, customers would not recommend SAP’s software).

One step forward, three steps back

Another ambivalent example of how SAP is listening to customers again: the new deadline 2027/2030. To extend maintenance for Business Suite 7 with AnyDB as well as AS Abap, AS Java and the NetWeaver stack was the right decision – but who is going to pay for that? Technical, organizational, personnel and licensing challenges lie ahead. One swallow doesn’t make a summer, and extended maintenance doesn’t solve all of customers’ problems. Customer dissatisfaction roots in so many things: inconsistent on-prem and cloud APIs, confusing business partner definitions, half-baked roadmaps as well as lack of integration.

Another construction site: SAP Lumira

The ERP company seems a little misguided in general. Of course it’s the right decision to offer customers a strategy for visualizing analyses and big data – Lumira enjoys high customer acceptance, after all. However, it’s the wrong decision to cancel Lumira without a clear migration path to SAP Analytics Cloud.

Asking customers for their opinion is the right thing to do but asking customers what to do is another thing entirely. SAP needs to realize how big a role it plays in customers’ digital transformation. SAP is the ERP company, and customers look to it for answers and solutions, not just products.

SAP

SAP promises to support S/4HANA through 2040

SAP is taking a carrot-and-stick approach to moving customers from its legacy ERP software, Business Suite 7, to its newer S/4HANA platform.

The carrot is a bold promise to support S/4HANA at least through 2040, meaning that businesses switching today will get over two decades’ use out of the new platform.

SAP co-CEO Christian Klein says enterprises are keen to move to S/4HANA, but some of the larger ones are telling him they won’t be ready by 2025, the deadline SAP had previously set to end support for its legacy software. For those companies, “It’s not so much about the technology, it’s really about adapting long-standing business processes, adapting to the needs of the customers in the digital world,” Klein says.

There’s also been some concern that an SAP skills shortage could leave some customers without the help they need to migrate their systems.

The 2 percent solution

Extended maintenance will cost an additional 2 percent of the annual license fee, on top of the 20 percent fee for mainstream maintenance.

The new cut-off date will affect users of SAP’s core enterprise software component, ERP 6.0, and the core applications of SAP Business Suite 7, including Customer Relationship Management, Supply Chain Management and Supplier Relationship Management.

Procrastinators hoping that SAP will relent and offer another extension in future are out of luck: “For extended maintenance for the Business Suite 7 core applications, the end of 2030 is really the final date,” Klein says.

Even 2027 will be too soon for some, says EAC’s Greenbaum, noting that there are companies still running instances of R/2, a version of SAP’s ERP system that was superseded in the early 1990s.

The extension will remove a key commercial argument for SAP competitors such as Oracle, who have been playing on the uncertainty of what will happen after 2025 to tempt customers to switch, says Greenbaum.

t’s not a sign that CIOs should relax, he says. “I don’t think the customer of any vendor in this industry should be putting their feet up on the table and relaxing about digital transformation and about upgrading their business processes,” Greenbaum says. “But on the other hand, this allows for a calmer and more measured strategy, and that’s what people want.”

SAP

SAP Big Data: Optimizing The Architecture

Many big data projects I have been asked to review were in critical condition and the root cause always was that the team followed the rulebook on how to build a data lake to the letter.

One of these big data rules is to transform the data at query time instead of preparing the key performance indicators (KPI) upfront and allow only those to be analyzed.

All too often the rule is executed by dumping all data as-is into the data lake. CSV files, database exports, spreadsheets, text documents,… it is chaos. As a result the data is physically present but essentially inaccessible.

Late binding

A data warehouse is supposed to be the single point of truth. Everybody can query the “Revenue” and everybody has the same definition of what “Revenue” contains and what it doesn’t. While this is a good idea for many measures, the definition of others is not always as clear.

In the weblog analysis the KPI “reading duration” is defined as “time between accessing one page and within 10 minutes another”. Why 10 minutes? What would be the impact on the calculated duration if using 9 minutes instead? While it is definitely a good idea to provide a KPI with the official definition “reading duration” for correlations, the data scientist will want to do more.

Hence the requirement to make the raw data (and consequently big data) accessible. But does that also mean in the original source format, meaning a 1:1 copy of the webserver logs? What will happen if that data gets converted from the text format into a compressed binary format easier to read? Would that violate one of the data lake rules if 100 percent of the information is present but in a different format?

New deal

Because storing the data in databases was the only option in the past, many data sources could not be added to the data warehouse or only in a pre-aggregated fashion. Today, I would use the data lake as data warehouse staging area on steroids.

All data are added in a binary compressed columnar table format. Parquet format* is the defacto standard. This makes it easier for the data scientist as well as the data warehouse to consume the data. The data warehouse still contains the aggregated data, using the official definition of the KPI.

Data science

The reason the data warehouse plays a significant role in this context is because of its ease of use and speed. Most of the users only care about the predefined KPIs. Their typical analysis is to create correlations between the data. And that is the sweet spot for databases like SAP Hana – smaller volumes, fast aggregations, fast search, many joins.

A data lake is the exact opposite. It can store unlimited amounts of data cheaply, can parallelize processing on a single table efficiently and provides complex processing way beyond SQL queries.

The combination of the two, data lake and data warehouse, is the winning proposition.

SAP

An Overview of SAP Material Management

In this SAP MM blog article, you will find different aspects of the SAP MM Module, such as its functionalities and operations, as well as different components and subcomponents including master data, purchasing, billing, human resource management, and inventory management.

In this SAP MM blog article, I will cover these topics which are given below :

  • What is SAP MM Module?
  • Features of SAP MM Module
  • Advantages of SAP MM Module
  • Procurement Process
  • Types of Procurement
  • Basic Procurement
  • Special Procurement
  • Structure of an Organization
  • SAP R/3
  • Procurement Cycle
  • Inventory Management

We will begin this SAP MM blog article by learning the SAP MM Module. SAP MM Module is an integral part of the SAP ERP Software. SAP Material Management is used by various companies to handle their purchasing and transactional data as it is both cost and time-efficient. SAP Material Management belongs to the logistic function which helps the industry from procurement to delivery of products. SAP MM Module consists of various units to handle material procurement and vendors, inspect the material condition and quality, as well as payment of the vendors. What is SAP Business Process in SAP MM Module? SAP Business Process is an integral part of the SAP MM Module. It handles the sales, Manufacturing, Distribution, Unit Maintenance, Planning, and Warehouse Management of a company. It helps manage the Inventory and Human Resources of a company.

Features of SAP MM Module

Some of the key features of SAP MM Module are as follows: It deals with Inventory Management and Material Management. It is a process that keeps in check the scarcity or violation in the Supply Chain of a company. It Manages Procurement activities. To accelerate productivity and cut the cost, it manages Material (products/services) and resources of a company. It handles Master Data, Valuation of Material, Material Requirement, Invoice Verification, etc.

Advantages of SAP MM Module

  • It minimizes the cost of operations.
  • It reduces inventory losses by removing unnecessary or obsolete material.

Procurement Process In SAP MM Module

This article will certainly help you to understand about the Procurement Process in an SAP MM module. This SAP MM blog article will show the various kinds of Procurement Process.

Every company requires material or service to satisfy their requirements, and thus, they purchase them. This procedure is referred to as procurement.

SAP

SAP Data Intelligence: Next evolution of SAP Data Hub

In order to better meet the needs of our customers we are constantly evolving and innovating our products.  Topics related to data integration and data orchestration are evolving at an especially rapid rate as companies need to apply data management strategies not only to their SAP data, but also to their 3rd party data such as streaming data, data from various cloud solutions, IoT, media and other types of data which is required for business processing and data-driven innovation.

SAP Data Hub is a data orchestration and management solution running on Kubernetes, leveraging open source and embedding machine learning capabilities. It was released by SAP in 2017 to deal with big data and complex data orchestration working across distributed landscapes and processing engines, enhancing developer productivity and extracting value from distributed data.

During the last two year’s we’ve seen a lot of customer projects and landscapes evolving towards automated and intelligent data integration embracing machine learning processes.

In 2019 SAP Data Hub was released as managed service on SAP Cloud Platform with the name SAP Data Intelligence.  The name SAP Data Intelligence highlights the evolution of SAP Data Hub to operationalize data science and machine learning with the inclusion of the SAP Leonardo Machine Learning Foundation. SAP Data Intelligence provides all the integration, orchestration, metadata management, connectivity and rich services of SAP Data Hub with the services of SAP Leonardo Machine Learning in the cloud.  This combination is critical to enable collaboration between IT and data science teams. Data scientists continue to work with the tools they love, while working in collaboration with IT from prototyping to production, ensuring AI and machine learning projects can scale and are managed within IT guidelines. At the same time, the development and operation experience for data integration and ML is streamlined.

SAP

SAP As The Central Component Of Digital Transformation

Digitalization poses new challenges. To avoid pitfalls, companies need a structured approach. This is also true for S/4 Hana implementations as digital core, and a business transformation roadmap is indispensable for any migration.

Companies are currently dealing with one of the biggest challenges of the digital age: digitalizing all their business processes. Furthermore, they have to start leveraging new technologies like artificial intelligence, machine learning, predictive analytics or robotic process automation. Without them, the implementation of new, digital business models becomes impossible.

With S/4 Hana, SAP offers customers a stable core which, combined with SAP Cloud Platform, improves agility as well. This guarantees seamless integration and the possibility to leverage new technologies, resulting in a number of benefits, e.g. reduced maintenance or upgrade efforts.

Transformation roadmap indispensable

After these evaluations, an SAP business transformation roadmap becomes indispensable. It serves as a guide on how to best align business requirements with technological possibilities.

Competent and knowledgeable consultants or partners are able to assist in this process. They can make estimates about the costs of S/4 transformations, which is a problem that 46 percent of respondents weren’t able to tackle on their own. Additionally, partners offer know-how and experience that 32 of respondents were lacking.

Digital innovation at the forefront

Future-proofing processes means to evaluate how new technologies like artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain, the Internet of Things, predictive analytics or robotic process automation can benefit companies. During these evaluations, it’ll quickly become clear that all of these innovations only really make a difference when companies combine them in a way that aligns with business strategy and long-term goals.

With SAP Cloud Platform, SAP offers a solution that combines these intelligent technologies and offers necessary integration services. SCP’s Accelerator packages are specifically designed for different industries and core functionalities and accelerate the implementation of digital innovations.

Roadmaps have to be accompanied by creating, testing and eventually implementing prototypes. By implementing prototypes, digital transformation becomes visible, which makes it easier to convince even the most hardcore sceptics of the importance of digitalization.

SAP

What Is SAP Data Services?

The name SAP Data Services is used for an entire family of products. The core is SAP Data Services itself, then there is SAP Data Integrator, SAP Data Quality and SAP CPI-DS.

The first three are the same product but differ from the enabled transformations. Data Integrator has all the base transforms plus typical data integration transforms like History Preserving. The Data Quality bundle consists of the base transforms plus Data Quality transforms like address cleansing. The SAP Data Services bundle contains all transforms.

Over the years Data Services grew to a very powerful tool and allows to implement every requirement efficiently and quickly. When I was part of the team, the development guideline had been to enable the customer performing even the most complex transformations with the combination of a few transforms. The tool also supports all SAP APIs available to pick the best suited one. Connecting to the database, generating Abap code for the extraction, call BAPIs/RFCs, send and receive IDOCs, use the modern ODP/ODQ API, web services, restful,… you name it.

Simplify integration

At one point in time, our team got tasked with a cloud version of an ETL tool – Cloud Platform Integration – Data Services or short CPI-DS. Its backend is still a normal Data Services but easier to install. Building a proper Web UI is expensive and, in some areas, not even possible.

Also, the goal was to simplify things. The easiest way to simplify a UI and keep development cost down is to remove functionality. CPI-DS can therefore be used for some specialized cases only.

SAP Data Services delivers on promises

All the marketing statements I heard recently have been supported by Data Services since the beginning. “Move the transformation to the data, not the data to the transformation” (SAP Data Hub) is called a pushdown in Data Services. “ELT instead of ETL” (SAP Hana) means to extract (E) the data first, then load (L) it into the target system and do the transformation (T) inside the database as follow up step.

Depending on the case, this is a good idea and therefore Data Services supports both approaches and the optimizer picks what makes the most sense.

Realtime Data Integration is supported also, but not implemented very well. It starts with the question “What data has been changed?” – a requirement for realtime streaming of changes. The philosophy of Data Services is to provide all techniques and APIs for any given source system and the user can choose which one to use. This makes sense as each has pros and cons.

There are other tools, SAP SLT for example, which can do a single method only, which reconfigure the source system to produce the changes and therefore getting changes in realtime is simpler. Both approaches have their merits.

The focus of Data Services on batch performance has downsides on transactional consistency, stability of dataflows running for multiple days as it would be required in realtime.

SAP

SAP S/4 Hana: Intelligence In Digital supply Chain

Every logistic and warehouse management  organization aspires to design, develop and deliver the product to the customers at the right time and right price. This involves a series of events that are to be orchestrated and followed by multiple iterations over and over to gain the expected results.

In order to obtain the desired results, it is a requisite to have intelligently coordinated functioning solutions.SAP having numerous sap s/4 Hana in warehouse management through the digital supply chain available which helps the organization to build the supply chain digitally.

This blog post helps a broad understanding of the requirement for niche sap solution depending upon the requirements by evaluating the needs and deliver the apt sap s/4 Hana solution for warehouse management organization based on their requirements in wholesale distribution

The three important processeses in product-based enterprises are:

  1.   Research and Development.
  2. Planning and manufacture
  3. Transport and deliver

1)  Research and development (R&d) 

This is a very important phase of the whole process where developing particular end products by analyzing the requirements, managing high specifications, formulating the perfect solution for wholse sale distribution industry and further carrying information digitally in supply chain central systems.

All these processes are handled by sap recipe development and it streamlines the formulations, real-time simulations, determines the equipment requirements and other R&D related needs.

Collaboration with suppliers and customers in real-time is requisite for R&D.Sap s/4 Hana cloud for intelligent product design provides the platform to collaboration between suppliers and customers for such needs which channelize the data, documents, bill material and also have a workflow to monetize data or the document movements.

Visualization of the product is an important aspect of designing a product. There is a drastic difference between visualizing a materialistic product and an end product in a sap solution. 

2) Planning and manufacture for optimized supply chain

Providing the product at the right time, price and place in terms of customer requirements need for a well-oiled Digital supply chain. It involves the following:

Providing the product at the right time, cost and position of customer requirements. it requires a well-managed digital supply chain. It entails the following

  • Developing precise statistical forecasts for the demand
  • Ensuring a better level of inventory to reach the needs of customer demands and requirements.
  • Pre-planned optimal business plan to assure revenue growth and market share.
  • Automate manufacturing processes efficiently for resource management manufacturing products of good quality.
  • Having insights into the manufacturing data insights to assure lower operational costs of manufacturing and production over plants.

3) Transport and Delivery for optimized yard logistics

Transportation and delivery of goods to the customer poses its own challenges to every organization. It varies from organization to organization depending on the type of products, customers, demand, geographies, transportation modes, and distribution network. The following three key areas are relevant in this context:

The Transportation and delivery of the components have their own challenges for each and every organization. The challenges are for individual enterprises are different predominantly depending on the type of products, customer, demand, a network of distribution. The following are the key area

  • Managing the overall transport operation of units in the yard
  • Coordinating the manufacturer’s end products in the warehouse and shipping them effectively.

Sap yard logistics solutions act as an intermediate between the distribution and transportation operations and the warehouse. It has the ability to streamline the planning, execution, and settlement of the tasks in yards with holistic integration with the back end process. With the assistance of IoT and data captured by it. It’s simple to adapt yard processes for individual modes of transportation means and yards. It utilizes workforce and assets. It can be integrated with sap extended warehouse and transportation management.

SAP

SAP S/4 Hana Transition Journeys Must Start Now

Late 2018, SAP announced that just 2,100 of its customers were live with S/4 Hana. With just seven years to go until SAP ceases to support its current ECC, there’s still a long journey ahead for users looking to transition to the next generation platform. Seven years may seem a long time, but not in SAP terms.

A survey out by Americas’ SAP User Group (ASUG) showed that 56 percent are planning to make the move to S/4 Hana but haven’t even started the process yet. 32 percent have made a start or are already live, while 12 percent aren’t planning to switch at all.

The UK & Ireland SAP User Group (UKISUG) painted a not dissimilar picture, with 52 percent planning to migrate within the next 1-2 years, 38 percent in the next 3-5 years; only 9 percent are in the process of doing so, and just 2 percent are actually live.

Migrating to any new platform is a massive undertaking. Time, lack of resources and focus on other IT priorities are just some of the reasons that many organisations aren’t as advanced with the state of their migration to S/4 Hana as they’d hoped to be.

Light at the end of the S/4 Hana tunnel

The complexity of a move to S/4 Hana also isn’t helping with business migration plans. Although there are several functional commonalities between ECC and S/4 Hana, the transition cannot be considered a simple upgrade. In some areas, it will require significant changes in both business processes and functionality and requires detailed planning and change management.

Scientific Drilling on its way to S/4 Hana

The company faced a challenging migration to S/4 Hana having ERP data in multiple homegrown systems as well as in ECC. Initially, the company used SAP’s LSMW migration tool but had only succeeded in transferring material master data from one of the 108 manufacturing plants. The IT team at Scientific Drilling then evaluated the SAP Data Services tool but felt it would not meet their needs given that their cutover deadline was in four months.

Imperial Logistics’ transition journey

Imperial Logistics International is another organisation that used a Microsoft Excel-based SAP data management software solution to speed up their transition to S/4 Hana. The accounting team needed to migrate finance data from their ECC system to S/4 Hana for thirty subsidiaries. The team first piloted another solution with external consultants, but after taking six weeks to build and test scripts for just four of the thirty companies it became clear that they needed to move faster.

Five months after initial product training, the accounting team was able to successfully migrate their finance data to S/4 Hana for all thirty subsidiaries without the need for external consultants.

As was the case with Scientific Drilling, the accounting team was also able to improve the quality of their financial data during the migration process.

sap-vs-oracle
SAP

SAP v/s Oracle

SAP and Oracle are the two major vendors in the world for ERP application. SAP started in 1972 and is headquartered at Walldorf, Germany. SAP started with the single-tier SAP system, and now it has a range of products right up-to cloud solutions and AI. Oracle, founded in 1977, California, started with its first flagship product, a database. Under business applications, Oracle’s first product was General Ledger functionality and then gradually started offering other features too in its Oracle eBusiness Suite. Like SAP, Oracle also moved on to cloud-based solutions and machine learning.

According to research firm Gartner, in 2018, of the global ERP market, Oracle had an 11% share while SAP had a share of 22%. Being tier 1 players, both the ERPs have robust platforms and have a vast customer base. In this article, we will explore the strengths and challenges of both ERPs.

Time and Cost

Two critical factors for an ERP system implementation is the time taken for implementation and cost. On average Oracle’s customer takes 1.2 years to implement, SAP projects implementation goes for around 1.5 years[i]. SAP’s markets to the companies with a billion-dollar in annual revenue. These implementations are global and have customizations.

According to Panorama’s survey, the cost of ERP implementation should be less than 2% for a company’s annual revenue. However, more than half of the companies with ERP would agree on cost over-runs. In terms of the percentage, SAP customer spends 4% of its annual revenue while the average Oracle customer spends 1.7% only[ii].

Multiple Hosting Option

Gone are the days when companies with ERPs preferred on-premise implementation. With lower initial investment and price flexibility among other benefits, these days the trend is for hosting your ERP On-Cloud.

SAP has three ERP cloud solutions for every business type, whether large, medium or small.  These are subscription-based (SaaS), cloud-based ERP.  Irrespective of the business industry. These solutions include modules to manage business data.

SAP S/4 HANA Cloud is for large enterprise-level

SAP Business ByDesign Cloud is for medium enterprise level

SAP Business One Cloud for a small or midsize company

Oracle has Fusion Cloud ERP. Oracle Cloud’s application suite promises seamless functionality across different modules like finance, HR, and supply chain. Few modules but not limited to offer on-cloud by Oracle are Financials, Project Management, Procurement, Risk Management Supply Chain Management and Analytics for cloud ERP.

However, both the ERPs are in the middle of transitioning the legacy products like SAP ECC, Oracle eBusiness Suite, Oracle NetSuite, and Plex Systems.

Recommended Reading How ERP helps for Manufacturing Industry?

Scalability

Businesses grow and expand, making it critical for their ERPs to support this growth. SAP and Oracle ERPs, both have proven scalable capabilities.

SAP has a single system giving a consistent feel. It has developed its products in-house and integrated them into one system. Whereas, Oracle has the best-of-breed option with JD Edwards, Fusion, E-Business Suite, Hyperion, and Siebel. Therefore, companies looking for scalability with standardization and consistency, SAP is the best option. For a decentralized model and more flexibility, Oracle ERP is the best option.

Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

SAP has integrated the customer relationship management (CRM) tool in its ERP system. Whereas, Oracles offers CRM as a stand-alone service, which can be integrated with the Oracle ERP Cloud.

SAP has built-in functionality that enables to manage marketing, sales and finance, giving you the complete information on your customers. Customers’ behavioural trends and history makes it easy to forecast sales and manage receivables.

Whereas, Oracle doesn’t offer a complete sales functionality within the ERP Cloud product. They are becoming a disadvantage for the sales teams. However, few outstanding features like strong financial management make it easier to get customer’s orders, sales records, making it extremely useful for strategic decision making.

Below are mentioned a few examples of the differences between SAP and Oracle ERPs.

  • SAP supports the telephony interface functionality wherein inbound call queue management is present that puts the incoming calls to the next available operator. Oracle has third-party support for the same functionality.
  • SAP supports competitor scenario analysis, whereas Oracle needs modification for the same.

To summarize. SAP excels in CRM, and Oracle’s strengths are in reporting capabilities.

Financials

Both SAP and Oracle ERP system offer a comprehensive financial feature like but not limited to pricing, accounting and budgeting. Oracle gives the flexibility to the user in terms of buying the complete financial product or required modules only. However, with SAP being an integrated ERP, this flexibility is a challenge.

Oracle offers risk management solutions, automates standard compliance present across industries. SAP’s risk management helps business identify and understand the risk factors. Oracle has a more comprehensive financial suite compared to SAP.

An example of the difference between the two ERPs is SAP supports each entity’s ledger having its accounting periods opened and closed, whereas Oracle needs modifications to support this.

Supply Chain Management

To track customers behaviour and manage customer relationships, CRM is available. However, suppliers can’t be left behind, which makes having SCM capabilities critical.

Distribution Management and the Purchase Order Processing feature of respective ERP is equally capable. SAP’s ‘procure to pay’ and ‘Order to cash’ module help companies manage purchases and contracts with vendors. It also helps in identifying trends to take strategic decisions. From supplier registration to invoice payment, Oracle’s ‘Supplier Invoice to Payment’ tools makes purchasing easier for a company.

The ERP start to diverge with Event Management and Advanced Planning System (APS). SAP is better with event management with better visibility of the supply chain, and Oracle has better APS, allowing companies to track costs and allocate resources accordingly.

Inventory

Inventory management is an essential part of all the manufacturing companies. Both the ERPs, equally efficient, provide real-time information on stock availability. This prevents disruption of the production process because of a shortage of supply. Real-time data makes the process efficient, and the company can meet its market’s demand on time. Oracle prides in boosted productivity and SAP takes pride that it completely prevents stock shortages.

As an example of the difference between the two is planning of BOM against actual orders, Oracle supports this whereas SAP needs modification for the same.

Human Resource

SAP ERP provides companies with tons of HR functions, such as payroll, simple employee onboarding, and allowing employees to self-manage timesheets, procurement processes, and personal information management. SAP also provides e-recruiting functionality, that optimizes recruiters’ work patterns and increases their productivity. It also includes workflow support.

Oracle has the Human Resources Management System. This software manages internal HR functions like payroll, recruitment, training, talent and employee engagement, and employee attendance. This HR software today is present as human capital management cloud solutions.

Example of a difference between both ERPs is the functionality of review and maintain deduction information for automatic bill payment service. SAP supports this functionality and, Oracle needs modification for the same.

As we have seen Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP ERP both are equally capable with not much advantage over each other. Functionality wise, SAP has more as compared to Oracle, but not more than 2% of the total.  An ERP system should meet unique needs and wants for its company. Some companies need standard business processes while others go for deep customizations. A company should first internally introspect and discuss their requirements from an ERP, their existing business processes, standardization needs and scope of the change. Implementing ERP impacts employees too. Employees should be familiarized and trained for the ERP.

ERP will be a significant investment in time and money.  A successful implementation will allow the business to operate efficiently and cost-effectively.


If your company is trying to decide between an SAP product and an Oracle product, our ERP consultants can help. Request a free consultation below.

× How can I help you?